Home > EMU Crisis, France > Can France Survive Without Europe?

Can France Survive Without Europe?

I should begin by saying that it is sad to see that my last post dates from February 20. Lots of things going on right now, in particular the wrapping up a book on the history of macro, that is draining all my energies. But I need to try harder to keep the blog going…

At any rate, tomorrow France votes. And I wrote a piece for Social Europe, in which I try to put the outcome of the election in the European context. If you do not want to read all of it, here are the bullet points:

  1. France is considered the sick man of Europe for the standard reasons (rigidity lack of reform etc)
  2. 2) But in fact “hard” data are not that bad, rather the contrary (productivity investment FDI, etc). Just look at Thomas Piketty’s blog post from a few months ago.
  3. lost competitiveness is price competitiveness, that is not France’s fault, but Germany’s (wage deflation).
  4. In fact the sick man of Europe is Europe itself, because it forces countries into a dilemma:
    • They can engage in fiscal competition and internal devaluation. But let’s not fool ourselves, there is no way that this can be done without killing the European social model. Only the downsizing of the welfare state can allow reducing taxes and labour costs and keeping public finances sustainable;
    • Or, they (try to) protect their social model, but pay the price of low competitiveness and slow growth.
  5. France oscillated between Scylla and Charybdis, leaning more towards the second path.  And it suffers, because most other countries did take the internal devaluation  path, willingly or not . Everything in the way the EMU is constructed, pushes countries to engage in deflationary policies.
  6. Exiting (from the Euro, from the ECU, from the EU) would in no way subtract countries to the dilemma. A small open economy would have an even harder time carrying on autonomous economic policies (more in general, what I think of XXexit is well summarized here. To be fair to my colleagues, I contributed very little to that piece, but was happy to sign it).
  7. Thus, the survival of the French model is in Europe, or it is nowhere. The next President’s fate will have to be decided there
  8. If France wants to save its social model, it needs to trigger change in the EU. It will save its model. Otherwise it is doomed; it will not survive, socially and electorally, to five more years of muddling through.
  9. And viceversa, if there is a chance for Europe to change, that chance is represented by a coalition against deflationary policies that only France would have the strength to form and lead. There is one way, and only one way, to escape Scylla and Charybdis.

I did not write that in the Social Europe piece, but I want to add that the path is very narrow. Macron has the virtue of putting Europe at the center of his project, but his reform proposals are for the moment very vague. And more importantly, his tax reduction plan resembles a bit too much to the good ol’  supply side measures that sank Jean-Baptiste Hollande.  But then, what do we know? First, policies are shaped by events; and second Le Pen would of course mean the end of the Euro right now. So, we can just hope that (and fight for) France and Europe will walk that narrow path.

  1. Patrick VB
    May 8, 2017 at 11:36 am

    Hello Francesco, thanks for your new blog post! Congrats (I suppose…) for your new president. I really wonder… Is there no life outside of the (Germany-led) EU and Euro Area? Sure, the transition out of it would be rocky, surely for financal markets. But if France left, Italy, Spain, Portugal would surely follow, allowing for the constitution of a new (France-led) “South-EU” next to a new Germany-led (including the Baltics, NL, BE, Os) “North-EU”. “North-EU” would have a strong currency relative to “South-EU”, surely an advantage for South-EU (where competent monetary authorities would keep inflation in check around a symetric target of about 2.5-3.0 % per annum). What’s more, “South-EU” would regain a meaningful monetary policy and could be organised so that the area or its members have a meaningful discretionary fiscal policy space. These 2 tools for steering an economy are no longer available (one-size-fits-all monetary policy / SGP-2pack-6pack) in any meaningful sense in the current Euro Area or EU-28 or its individual member states.

  2. Börje Widerberg
    May 15, 2017 at 12:48 pm

    Most of us would like to save the EU. At least to save Peace in Europé but the hard fact is that I can´t see how that will be done if nothing very radical is done to the EURO. There are more than one way that could be done, to split it ino two parts or rearange it more fundamentally.
    Börje Widerberg

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply to Börje Widerberg Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: